The intricate dance of non-coding RNAs in myasthenia gravis pathogenesis and treatment.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) stands as a perplexing autoimmune disorder affecting the neuromuscular junction, driven by a multitude of antibodies targeting postsynaptic elements. However, the mystery of MG pathogenesis has yet to be completely uncovered, and its heterogeneity also challenges diagnosis and treatment. Growing evidence shows the differential expression of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) in MG has played an essential role in the development of MG in recent years. Remarkably, these aberrantly expressed ncRNAs exhibit distinct profiles within diverse clinical subgroups and among patients harboring various antibody types. Furthermore, they have been implicated in orchestrating the production of inflammatory cytokines, perturbing the equilibrium of T helper 1 cells (Th1), T helper 17 cells (Th17), and regulatory T cells (Tregs), and inciting B cells to generate antibodies. Studies have elucidated that certain ncRNAs mirror the clinical severity of MG, while others may hold therapeutic significance, showcasing a propensity to return to normal levels following appropriate treatments or potentially foretelling the responsiveness to immunosuppressive therapies. Notably, the intricate interplay among these ncRNAs does not follow a linear trajectory but rather assembles into a complex network, with competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) emerging as a prominent hub in some cases. This comprehensive review consolidates the landscape of dysregulated ncRNAs in MG, briefly delineating their pivotal role in MG pathogenesis. Furthermore, it explores their promise as prospective biomarkers, aiding in the elucidation of disease subtypes, assessment of disease severity, monitoring therapeutic responses, and as novel therapeutic targets.

Social support and medication adherence among adult myasthenia gravis patients in China: the mediating role of mental health and self-efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG), a rare chronic neuromuscular disorder, is characterized by progressive physical decline and requires long-term pharmacological treatment. Due to the decline of physical and social abilities, MG patients are in great need of social support, including tangible and emotional support. This study aims to examine the association between social support and medication adherence and the possible mediating effects of mental health and self-efficacy among MG patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis of a nationwide MG registry was conducted on 865 patients under oral medication treatment in China between June and July 2022. Validated scales were used to measure the respondent's mental distress (Four-item Patient Health Questionnaire), social support (Modified Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Scale), self-efficacy for medication use (Self-efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale), and medication adherence (Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, MMAS). RESULTS: The association between social support and medication adherence and possible mediating effects of mental distress and self-efficacy were tested by structural equation model, with significant demographic and disease-related factors adjusted. The respondents showed a very low level of medication adherence (71.2% poor adherence; 1.4% high adherence; mean MMAS = 4.65). The level of social support was positively associated with medication adherence, and such association was fully mediated by two indirect pathways: through self-efficacy (ß = 0.07, proportion mediated = 63.8%); and through mental distress and then self-efficacy (ß = 0.01, proportion mediated = 6.7%). CONCLUSION: Provision of social support and interventions on mental health with emphasis on improving self-efficacy for medication use may effectively improve medication adherence among MG patients.

The ClC-1 chloride channel inhibitor NMD670 improves skeletal muscle function in rat models and patients with myasthenia gravis.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a neuromuscular disease that results in compromised transmission of electrical signals at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) from motor neurons to skeletal muscle fibers. As a result, patients with MG have reduced skeletal muscle function and present with symptoms of severe muscle weakness and fatigue. ClC-1 is a skeletal muscle specific chloride (Cl-) ion channel that plays important roles in regulating neuromuscular transmission and muscle fiber excitability during intense exercise. Here, we show that partial inhibition of ClC-1 with an orally bioavailable small molecule (NMD670) can restore muscle function in rat models of MG and in patients with MG. In severely affected MG rats, ClC-1 inhibition enhanced neuromuscular transmission, restored muscle function, and improved mobility after both single and prolonged administrations of NMD670. On this basis, NMD670 was progressed through nonclinical safety pharmacology and toxicology studies, leading to approval for testing in clinical studies. After successfully completing phase 1 single ascending dose in healthy volunteers, NMD670 was tested in patients with MG in a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-dose, three-way crossover clinical trial. The clinical trial evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of NMD670 in 12 patients with mild MG. NMD670 had a favorable safety profile and led to clinically relevant improvements in the quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) total score. This translational study spanning from single muscle fiber recordings to patients provides proof of mechanism for ClC-1 inhibition as a potential therapeutic approach in MG and supports further development of NMD670.

Patient perceptions of disease burden and treatment of myasthenia gravis based on sentiment analysis of digital conversations.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare, autoimmune, antibody-mediated, neuromuscular disease. This study analyzed digital conversations about MG to explore unprovoked perspectives. Advanced search, data extraction, and artificial intelligence-powered algorithms were used to harvest, mine, and structure public domain digital conversations about MG from US Internet Protocol addresses (August 2021 to August 2022). Thematic analyses examined topics, mindsets, and sentiments/key drivers via natural language processing and text analytics. Findings were described by sex/gender and treatment experience with steroids or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). The 13,234 conversations were extracted from message boards (51%), social media networks (22%), topical sites (21%), and blogs (6%). Sex/gender was confirmed as female in 5703 and male in 2781 conversations, and treatment experience was with steroids in 3255 and IVIg in 2106 conversations. Topics focused on diagnosis (29%), living with MG (28%), symptoms (24%), and treatment (19%). Within 3176 conversations about symptoms, eye problems (21%), facial muscle problems (18%), and fatigue (18%) were most commonly described. Negative sentiments about MG were expressed in 59% of conversations, with only 2% considered positive. Negative conversations were dominated by themes of impact on life (29%), misdiagnosis problems (27%), treatment issues (24%), and symptom severity (20%). Impact on life was a key driver of negativity in conversations by both men (27%) and women (34%), and treatment issues was a dominant theme in conversations by steroid-treated (29%) and IVIg-treated (31%) patients. Of 1382 conversations discussing treatment barriers, 36% focused on side effects, 33% on lack of efficacy, 21% on misdiagnosis, and 10% on cost/insurance. Side effects formed the main barrier in conversations by both steroid-treated and IVIg-treated patients. Capturing the patient voice via digital conversations reveals a high degree of concern related to burden of disease, misdiagnosis, and common MG treatments among those with MG, pointing to a need for treatment options that can improve quality of life.

Triple-seronegative myasthenia gravis: clinical and epidemiological characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease usually caused by antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR-Abs), muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK-Abs), or low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4-Abs). However, there are MG patients who do not have these antibodies and are thus said to have triple-seronegative (triple-SN) MG. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the frequency and clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with triple-SN MG. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study carried out through the analysis of medical records. Descriptive and analytical statistical analysis was performed comparing subgroups of myasthenic patients, classified according to serological profile. RESULTS: The sample population consisted of 93 MG patients: 85 were positive for antibodies, 80 (86%) with AChR-Abs, 5 (5.4%) with MuSK-Abs, and no MG patients with LRP4-Abs. Eight patients (8.6%) had triple-SN MG; they had a median age at disease onset of 30 years (21-45). Their most common initial symptoms were ptosis, diplopia, and generalized weakness. Most patients presented with mild symptoms at their last visit, reflecting a median MG composite scale score of 4 (0-6), and 75% of patients had an adequate response to treatment. CONCLUSION: Our study showed a low frequency of triple-SN MG in Brazilian MG patients. Triple-SN MG was predominant in females, who presented with ptosis, diplopia, and generalized weakness, and most patients had an adequate response to immunosuppressive treatment. There was no significant difference between triple-SN MG and the other subgroups.

ANTECEDENTES: A Miastenia gravis (MG) é uma desordem autoimune geralmente causada por anticorpos antirreceptores de acetilcolina (anti-RACh), tirosina quinase músculo-específica (anti-MuSK) ou proteína 4 relacionada ao receptor de lipoproteína de baixa densidade (anti-LRP4). No entanto, em uma parcela dos pacientes, nenhum destes três anticorpos pôde ser detectado, sendo estes casos denominados "triplo-soronegativos". OBJETIVO: Descrever a frequência, bem como as características clínicas e epidemiológicas dos pacientes com MG triplo-soronegativa. MéTODOS: Consiste em um estudo transversal e restrospectivo, realizado através da análise de prontuários médicos. Foi realizada análise estatística descritiva e analítica entre os subgrupos de pacientes, classificados de acordo com o perfil sorológico. RESULTADOS: A população consistiu de 93 pacientes com MG: 85 pacientes apresentavam positividade para anticorpos, sendo 80 (86%) com anticorpos anti-RACh, cinco (5,4%) com anti-MuSK, e não foram encontrados pacientes com anti-LRP4. Oito (8,6%) eram pacientes triplo-soronegativos, que apresentaram idade média de início da doença de 30 anos (21-45), e com sintomas iniciais mais comuns de ptose, diplopia e fraqueza generalizada. 75% dos pacientes triplo-soronegativos apresentaram resposta adequada ao tratamento. CONCLUSãO: O estudo demonstrou uma baixa frequência da pacientes com MG triplo-soronegativa na população brasileira. A MG triplo-soronegativa foi predominante nas mulheres, que se apresentaram com ptose, diplopia ou fraqueza generalizada, e a maioria dos pacientes apresentou resposta adequada ao tratamento imunossupressor. Não houve diferença significativa entre a MG triplo-soronegativa e os demais subgrupos.

[Neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-A Novel Therapeutic Approach for Autoimmune Disease].

Neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) is involved in recycling of IgG. Recycling begins with IgG-uptake into the cell through pinocytosis. Subsequently, IgG binds to FcRn in acidic vesicles, which results in the recycling of the FcRn-IgG complex to cell surface, and the release of IgG in blood with neutral pH. Whereas IgG unbound to FcRn is not recycled and thus degraded in lysosomes. Therefore, FcRn plays a critical role in maintaining IgG levels in the blood. Recently, FcRn has been considered a therapeutic target for autoimmune diseases caused by IgG autoantibodies, and FcRn inhibitors are developed as therapeutic agents for the diseases. As one example, the administration of an FcRn inhibitor, efgartigimod, reduced IgG and anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody levels in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), and improved Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living score in the phase III trial. In 2022, Efgartigimod Alfa was approved for the treatment of gMG (only when treatment with steroids or non-steroidal immunosuppressive drugs do not lead to sufficient response), regardless of antibody status in Japan. Since FcRn inhibitors have just begun to be used in clinical practice, it is important to accumulate real-world data regarding their efficacy and safety. (Received August 21, 2023; Accepted October 6, 2023; Published February 1, 2024).

Therapeutic Effect and Side Effects of Pharmacotherapy in Patients With Parkinson Disease and Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review of Case Reports and Case Series Studies.

PURPOSE: The co-existence of Parkinson disease (PD) and myasthenia gravis (MG) in an individual should be exceptionally rare. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the current literature regarding the therapeutic effect and side effects of pharmacotherapy on patients with PD and MG. METHODS: Five bioscience and engineering databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) were searched from inception through February 21, 2022. Case reports and case series studies investigating pharmacotherapy in patients with PD and MG were included. Procedures were followed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The methodologic quality of included studies was evaluated by using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series Studies. FINDINGS: Sixteen case reports and 5 case series studies with 32 participants met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies were rated as good quality, 10 were fair quality, and 3 were poor quality. The side effects of pharmacotherapy for PD or MG led to another disease, indicating an imbalance between dopamine and acetylcholine within human bodies. IMPLICATIONS: When treating a patient who has PD or MG, health providers should be cautious about the occurrence of another disease. Timely treatment must rely on monitoring new symptoms as soon as the pharmacotherapy for PD or MG is initiated. Physical therapy may be helpful in decreasing the side effects of pharmacotherapy in patients with PD and MG. A new treatment pattern of pharmacotherapy + physical therapy for patients with PD and MG warrants further research. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews identifier: CRD42022308066.

Normalized circulating Tfh and Th17 associates with improvement in myasthenia gravis treated with ofatumumab.

Objective: To assess the effect of B cell depletion therapy (BCDT) on circulating T follicular helper (cTfh) and circulating T helper 17 (cTh17) cells and its relation to clinical improvement in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). Methods: 28 anti-AchR positive MG patients treated with ofatumumab and 28 healthy controls (HCs) were included. Frequencies of cTfh and cTh17 cells were monitored by flow cytometry at baseline and 4, and 12 weeks after the initial dose ofatumumab. Serum cytokines associated with cTfh and cTh17, including IL-6, IL-21, and IL-17, were also analyzed. Results: The frequency of cTfh and cTh17 significantly increased in MG patients compared with HCs. Additionally, elevated levels of both T-cell subsets correlated with MG severity. During the follow-up, cTfh and cTh17 return to normal after BCDT. Furthermore, the decrease in cTfh and cTh17 was associated with MG scores improvement over time. Notably, cTfh- and cTh17-related cytokines, including IL-6, IL-21, and IL-17, exhibited a marked decrease following ofatumumab therapy. Conclusions: Abnormal expansion of cTfh and cTh17 cells may be key features in the immunopathology of MG. Their levels returned to normal after BCDT, which was closely correlated with clinical amelioration. This result suggests that these two T-cell subsets may be targets for BCDT treatment of MG.

Pediatric Ocular Myasthenia Gravis: Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no universally accepted standard treatment for ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) in children. We aimed to investigate the possible proper regimens and timing of treatment for pediatric OMG cases based on the clinical manifestations: OMG with ptosis only and OMG with other features. METHODS: One hundred and forty two OMG cases attended at the Department of Pediatrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, from 2010 to 2019 were included, and information from medical records was reviewed and recorded. Comparisons of clinical characteristics between patients with OMG with ptosis only and patients with OMG with other features as well as between patients treated with glucocorticoid (GC) within or after six months from disease onset were performed. RESULTS: OMG with other features constituted about 54.9% of the cases, and 66.2% of the patients achieved optimal outcome. Patients with OMG with ptosis only responded to pyridostigmine alone more than patients with OMG with other features who required several therapies (P < 0.001). Patients with OMG with ptosis only had a larger proportion of optimal outcome than the patients with OMG with other features (P = 0.002), and the difference remained significant even when the individual outcome groups were compared (P < 0.001). Patients who received GC within six months had a greater proportion of optimal outcome than those who received it after six months (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although OMG with other features is a more common subtype of OMG, it is also more severe than OMG with ptosis only. An earlier addition of GC leads to optimal outcome.

How should newer therapeutic agents be incorporated into the treatment of patients with myasthenia gravis?

Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a postsynaptic neuromuscular junction disorder that results in fatigable muscle weakness. The traditional treatment approach includes the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, corticosteroids, and steroid-sparing immunosuppressant therapies (ISTs) for chronic management, whereas exacerbations and crises are managed with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange (PLEX). Over the past 6 years, four new therapeutic agents with novel immunological mechanisms of action-complement and neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibition-were approved as a result of clinically significant improvement in gMG symptoms of those treated with these newer agents in Phase 3 clinical trials. At present, it is unclear when and in whom to initiate these therapeutic agents and how to integrate them into the current treatment paradigm. When selecting a newer therapeutic agent, we use a simple equation: Value = Clinical Improvement/(Cost + Side Effects + Treatment Burden), which guides our decision-making. We consider using these novel therapeutic agents in two specific clinical situations. Firstly, the newer agents are fast-acting, suggesting they can be used in clinically unstable patients as "bridge therapy," and secondly, they provide additional options for those patients considered treatment-refractory. There are downsides, however, including treatment cost, unique side effect profiles, and intravenous and subcutaneous drug administration (though for some, this may be an advantage). As additional drugs enter the marketplace with unique mechanisms of action, routes of administration, and dosing schedules, the placement of the novel therapeutic agents in the gMG treatment algorithm will likely evolve.

Assessing the comparative efficacy of plasmapheresis and Intravenous immunoglobulin in myasthenia gravis treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune neuromuscular disorder characterized by muscle weakness, posing significant challenges to patients' daily lives. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and plasmapheresis are two prominent immunomodulatory therapies used in MG management, but the choice between them remains a clinical dilemma. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the comparative efficacy of IVIG versus plasmapheresis in MG management. METHODS: We adhered to PRISMA guidelines and prospectively registered the review protocol in PROSPERO. Systematic search across electronic databases identified 14 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Data from these studies were extracted, and assessed risk of bias. Primary outcomes included clinical efficacy, while secondary outcomes encompassed hospitalization, ventilation, antibody titers, and treatment-related complications. Statistical analysis was conducted using R software. RESULTS: The pooled results indicated that patients receiving plasmapheresis had higher odds of any improvement in MG symptoms compared to IVIG. However, change in severity scores did not significantly differ between the two treatments. Hospitalization durations were similar, but IVIG-treated patients tended to have shorter stays. Antibody titers, particularly anti-MUSK antibodies, favored plasmapheresis treatment. Complication rates were comparable between two groups. However, severe complications were more common in plasmapheresis. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive analysis suggests that plasmapheresis may offer superior short-term symptom improvement in MG compared to IVIG, while IVIG may lead to shorter hospital stays and lower complication rates. The choice between these treatments should be tailored to individual patient needs and disease characteristics. Further research is needed to explore long-term outcomes and mortality rates in MG management.

Comparative effectiveness of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil for myasthenia gravis (PROMISE-MG): a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disorder of the neuromuscular junction. Treatment typically includes symptomatic oral cholinesterase inhibitors, immunosuppression, and immunomodulation. In addition to corticosteroids, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil are the most frequently used immunosuppressants in North America. We aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of these two drugs, and to assess the effect of the dose and duration of treatment. METHODS: We did a prospective cohort study at 19 academic centres in Canada and the USA. We included patients (aged ≥18 years) with autoimmune myasthenia gravis, who were never treated with immunosuppressants. Treating clinicians determined the choice of medication, dose, follow-up intervals, and drug monitoring. Outcome measures and adverse events were recorded at each visit. We assessed two co-primary outcomes. The first was the patient-reported Myasthenia Gravis-Quality of Life 15-revised (MGQOL-15r) score, measured as the mean change from treatment initiation to the follow-up visit with the lowest score. A clinically meaningful reduction (CMR) in MGQOL-15r was defined as a 5-point decrease. The second was a composite clinical outcome of disease improvement (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Post-Intervention Status Minimal Manifestations or better) and low adverse event burden (defined as grade ≤1 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). We also compared these outcomes in patients receiving an adequate dose and duration of azathioprine (≥2 mg/kg per day for at least 12 months) or mycophenolate mofetil (≥2 g per day for at least 8 months) and a lower dose or shorter duration of these agents. We used propensity score weighting with generalised linear regression models. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03490539). FINDINGS: Between May 1, 2018, and Aug 31, 2020, 167 patients were enrolled; 85 did not receive azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil and were excluded. Four were excluded from outcome analyses because they had scores of 0 on an outcome measure at treatment initiation. Of the 78 patients included in analyses, 47 received mycophenolate mofetil (median follow-up 25 months [IQR 13·5-31·5]) and 31 received azathioprine (median follow-up 20 months [IQR 13-30]). The mean change in MG-QOL15r was -10·4 (95% CI -18·9 to -1·3) with mycophenolate mofetil and -6·8 (-17·2 to 3·6) with azathioprine (mean difference -3·3, 95% CI -7·7 to 1·2; p=0·15). 38 (81%) of 47 patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and 18 (57%) of 31 receiving azathioprine had a CMR in MG-QOL15r (risk difference 24·0%; 95% CI -0·2 to 48·0; p=0·052). The clinical composite outcome was achieved in 22 (47·7%) of 47 patients who received mycophenolate mofetil and nine (28·1%) of 31 who received azathioprine (risk difference 19·6%, 95% CI -4·9 to 44·2; p=0·12). Descriptive analysis did not find a difference in the proportion of patients reaching a CMR in MG-QOL15r between the adequate dose and duration group and the lower dose or shorter duration group. Adverse events occurred in 11 (32%) of 34 patients who received azathioprine and nine (19%) of 48 who received mycophenolate mofetil. The most frequent adverse events were hepatotoxicity with azathioprine (five [15%] of 34) and gastrointestinal disturbances (seven [15%] of 48) with mycophenolate mofetil. There were no study-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: More than half of patients treated with azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil felt their quality of life improved; no difference in clinical outcomes was noted between the two drugs. Adverse events associated with azathioprine were potentially more serious than those with mycophenolate mofetil, although mycophenolate mofetil is teratogenic. Lower than recommended doses of azathioprine might be effective, with reduced dose-dependent adverse events. More comparative effectiveness studies are required to inform treatment choices in myasthenia gravis. FUNDING: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America.

The Efficacy and Safety of Different Targeted Drugs for the Treatment of Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) has been transformed by the development and approval of new targeted therapies. This analysis aimed to rank and compare the new therapies for gMG using efficacy and safety data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov (up to November 2022) for RCTs of targeted drugs for gMG. We used a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) model and a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) model for statistical analysis. The primary outcome was the change in quantitative myasthenia gravis score (QMGS) from baseline, while the secondary outcome was the risk ratio (RR) of adverse events (AEs) during treatment. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank these targeted drugs, with higher SUCRA values indicating better efficacy or lower likelihood of AEs. RESULTS: In total, 13 studies (872 subjects) were included in this analysis evaluating 10 targeted drugs (batoclimab, belimumab, CFZ533, eculizumab, efgartigimod, nipocalimab, rituximab, ravulizumab, rozanolixizumab, and zilucoplan). With regards to the primary outcome, batoclimab [standardized mean difference (SMD), - 1.61; 95% credible interval (CrI), - 2.78, - 0.43] significantly reduced QMGS in patients with gMG when compared with placebo and was ranked as the most efficacious drug. Ranked second and third were eculizumab (SMD, - 0.67; 95% CrI, 1.43, 0.01) and zilucoplan (SMD, - 0.54; 95% CrI, - 1.56, 0.46), respectively. Nipoclimab (SMD, - 0.02; 95% CrI, - 1.04, 1.00) had the worst efficacy and ranked last among all targeted drugs. In our study, except for batoclimab, there was no statistically significant difference in the reduction of patient QMGS for the remaining targeted agents compared with placebo. With regards to the secondary outcomes, only batoclimab (RR, 0.19; 95% CrI, 0, 0.97) led to a significant reduction in the incidence of AEs when compared with the placebo. Belimumab (RR, 0.85; 95% CrI, 0.57, 1.19), CFZ533 (RR, 0.95; 95% CrI, 0.72, 1.25), eculizumab (RR, 0.99; 95% CrI, 0.85, 1.21), and efgartigimod (RR, 0.93; 95% CrI, 0.76, 1.15) also led to a lower incidence of AEs, although these effects were not significantly different from the placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Batoclimab had the best efficacy and safety for the treatment of gMG and was ranked first out of the 10 targeted drugs included in this study. Eculizumab was ranked second, and nipocalimab had the worst efficacy. With the exception of batoclimab, the incidence of AEs for the remaining drugs was not statistically significantly different from placebo. We note, however, that wide CrIs reflect the uncertainty in this analysis owing to the small number of available studies and low numbers of study participants; moreover, batoclimab had the widest CrI of all drugs in this analysis. More well-designed studies with long-term follow-up are needed to further evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of these drugs in the future.

Generalized myasthenia gravis with acetylcholine receptor antibodies: A guidance for treatment.

BACKGROUND: Generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) with antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor is a chronic disease causing muscle weakness. Access to novel treatments warrants authoritative treatment recommendations. The Nordic countries have similar, comprehensive health systems, mandatory health registers, and extensive MG research. METHODS: MG experts and patient representatives from the five Nordic countries formed a working group to prepare treatment guidance for MG based on a systematic literature search and consensus meetings. RESULTS: Pyridostigmine represents the first-line symptomatic treatment, while ambenonium and beta adrenergic agonists are second-line options. Early thymectomy should be undertaken if a thymoma, and in non-thymoma patients up to the age of 50-65 years if not obtaining remission on symptomatic treatment. Most patients need immunosuppressive drug treatment. Combining corticosteroids at the lowest possible dose with azathioprine is recommended, rituximab being an alternative first-line option. Mycophenolate, methotrexate, and tacrolimus represent second-line immunosuppression. Plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin are used for myasthenic crises and acute exacerbations. Novel complement inhibitors and FcRn blockers are effective and fast-acting treatments with promising safety profiles. Their use depends on local availability, refunding policies, and cost-benefit analyses. Adapted physical training is recommended. Planning of pregnancies with optimal treatment, information, and awareness of neonatal MG is necessary. Social support and adaptation of work and daily life activities are recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Successful treatment of MG rests on timely combination of different interventions. Due to spontaneous disease fluctuations, comorbidities, and changes in life conditions, regular long-term specialized follow-up is needed. Most patients do reasonably well but there is room for further improvement. Novel treatments are promising, though subject to restricted access due to costs.

Efficacy of ravulizumab in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis by time from diagnosis: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the CHAMPION MG study.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The CHAMPION MG study demonstrated that ravulizumab significantly improved Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total scores versus placebo in adults with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ gMG). This post hoc analysis aimed to assess these outcomes by time from MG diagnosis. METHODS: Changes from baseline to week 26 in MG-ADL and QMG total scores were analyzed by time from MG diagnosis to study entry (≤2 vs. >2 years). Within each subgroup, least-squares (LS) mean changes for ravulizumab and placebo were compared using mixed models for repeated measures. RESULTS: In ravulizumab-treated patients, differences in LS mean (standard error of the mean) changes from baseline to week 26 were not statistically significant in the ≤2-years subgroup versus the >2-years subgroup for MG-ADL (-4.3 [0.70] vs. -2.9 [0.37]; p = .0511) or QMG (-4.3 [0.94] vs. -2.5 [0.50]; p = .0822) scores. No clear trends were observed in the placebo group. LS mean changes from baseline were significantly greater for ravulizumab versus placebo in both the ≤2 and >2 years from diagnosis subgroups for MG-ADL and QMG scores (all p < .05). The difference in treatment effect between the ≤2-years and >2-years subgroups was not statistically significant. No clinically meaningful between-subgroup differences in treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in ravulizumab-treated patients. DISCUSSION: Ravulizumab treatment improved clinical outcomes for patients with AChR+ gMG regardless of time from diagnosis. A numerical trend was observed favoring greater treatment effect with earlier versus later treatment after diagnosis. Further studies are required for confirmation.

Diagnosis and evaluation of elderly-onset myasthenia gravis: A case report.

RATIONALE: Patients with elderly-onset myasthenia gravis can have a good prognosis with appropriate diagnosis and response, although it is difficult to differentiate between exacerbations of myasthenia gravis in elderly patients and age-related changes. Therefore, it is important for physicians to understand the clinical characteristics and safe assessment methods for patients with elderly-onset myasthenia gravis. PATIENT CONCERNS: An 82-year-old male diagnosed with myasthenia gravis 6 months prior had no difficulty in daily living. After falling on a golf course, he was diagnosed with a right femoral neck fracture on the 1st day and underwent right total hip replacement surgery on the 12th day, being transferred to our hospital for rehabilitation therapy on the 32nd day. However, immediately after transfer, the patient showed fatigability during training and difficulty swallowing food. DIAGNOSES: This case was diagnosed as an exacerbation of myasthenia gravis. INTERVENTIONS: Pyridostigmine was initiated with the expectation of immediate effect on the 54th day. OUTCOMES: His symptoms and physical functions improved immediately, and walking distance and food intake increased. From this clinical course, it was judged that immunosuppressive therapy was indicated as a transition to generalized myasthenia gravis. For this reason, he was discharged after arranging postdischarge visits to the department of neurology, accordingly. LESSONS: A better understanding of the characteristics of elderly-onset myasthenia gravis may allow for relatively safe assessment of the condition and improve its diagnosis and treatment.